All benchmarks
AlternativesSourced from Most accurate gas oracle, live gap vs realized priority fee

Blocknative alternatives

Probability-of-inclusion gas oracle with EIP-1559 tiered predictions

Blocknative publishes a probability-of-inclusion gas oracle that emits EIP-1559 tiered predictions (70, 80, 90, 95, 99 percent confidence) for Ethereum and Polygon, served from a no-key endpoint `?chainid=<N>`. The architecture is deliberate: an inclusion-confidence oracle over-predicts to guarantee landing, while a percentile tracker built on `eth_feeHistory` hugs the realized number by construction. Both choices have implications for a wallet or swap router picking the value to suggest to a user, which is what this benchmark surfaces. The harness polls each oracle at its tier-tolerant cadence (Blocknative every 12 seconds per chain), buffers the predicted priority fee with the predicted block height, and when that block is mined pulls the full block via `eth_getBlockByNumber(.., true)` on the chain's PublicNode RPC. Realized percentiles are computed from actual `maxPriorityFeePerGas` values across every included transaction, and the absolute error per (oracle, tier, chain) lands on both a gauge and a histogram. The table ranks on the p99 gap over 24 hours (the worst 1 percent of blocks) because at current fee levels the typical-minute gaps are fractions of a micro-gwei apart, while gas spikes are where wrong predictions actually cost money. A covered-rate column shows the share of time each prediction sat at or above the realized p50, the inclusion-side risk an absolute gap cannot show. Coverage is Ethereum and Polygon. Avalanche C-Chain was dropped because its auto-tuning fee market drives priority to zero across all oracles; BNB and OP-Stack L2s are excluded for structural reasons. The cohort competing with Blocknative includes PublicNode `eth_feeHistory`, Owlracle (multi-oracle aggregator on a 60-second free quota) and Etherscan v2's free tier.

About Blocknative: blocknative.com

Top 3 Blocknative alternatives

  1. Owlracle logo

    Owlracle

    #1 · Gap vs realized (gwei)

    0.315p99 ~0
  2. Etherscan logo

    Etherscan

    #2 · Gap vs realized (gwei)

    1.48p99 0.067
  3. PublicNode logo

    PublicNode

    #3 · Gap vs realized (gwei)

    1.5p99 ~0
Leader
0.315Owlracle
Range
1.5 → 0.3154 providers
Gap
0.2×leader vs lowest

Gap vs realized (gwei) · by product

  1. 01Owlracle logoOwlracle
    0.315
  2. 02Blocknative logoBlocknative
    0.870
  3. 03Etherscan logoEtherscan
    1.48
  4. 04PublicNode logoPublicNode
    1.5

Product ledger

ProductGap p99 (24h)Trend
NameGap p99 (24h)24h
01
Owlracle logoOwlracle
0.315
02
Blocknative logoBlocknative
0.870
03
Etherscan logoEtherscan
1.48
04
PublicNode logoPublicNode
1.5

Same data as /benchmarks/gas-estimation, refreshed every minute. OpenChainBench is community-run; methodology is open.