{"slug":"trading-platform-wallets","title":"Daily active wallets per trading terminal: Fomo vs Axiom vs pump.fun vs GMGN","subtitle":"Distinct wallets that traded through each terminal in one complete day, counted per chain rather than pooled, with swaps per wallet and volume per wallet beside the count.","category":"Trading","metric":"Active wallets 24h","unit":"count","status":"live","higherIsBetter":true,"filters":null,"value":86227,"leader":{"name":"Fomo","slug":"fomo","value":86227},"leaders":[{"name":"Fomo","slug":"fomo","value":86227}],"rankings":[{"name":"Fomo","slug":"fomo","ms":{"p50":86227,"p90":86227,"p99":86227,"mean":86227},"successRate":100,"sampleSize":1330360},{"name":"Axiom","slug":"axiom","ms":{"p50":70162,"p90":70162,"p99":70162,"mean":70162},"successRate":100,"sampleSize":2105970},{"name":"pump.fun","slug":"pump-fun","ms":{"p50":51554,"p90":51554,"p99":51554,"mean":51554},"successRate":100,"sampleSize":973877},{"name":"GMGN","slug":"gmgn","ms":{"p50":16892,"p90":16892,"p99":16892,"mean":16892},"successRate":100,"sampleSize":817910},{"name":"Terminal","slug":"padre","ms":{"p50":8324,"p90":8324,"p99":8324,"mean":8324},"successRate":100,"sampleSize":282010},{"name":"Trojan","slug":"trojan","ms":{"p50":3920,"p90":3920,"p99":3920,"mean":3920},"successRate":100,"sampleSize":58427},{"name":"Photon","slug":"photon","ms":{"p50":1025,"p90":1025,"p99":1025,"mean":1025},"successRate":100,"sampleSize":18177},{"name":"Maestro","slug":"maestro","ms":{"p50":925,"p90":925,"p99":925,"mean":925},"successRate":100,"sampleSize":15323}],"sparkline":[86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227,86227],"sampleSize":5602054,"asOf":"2026-10-07T18:44:50.022Z","freshness":{"asOf":"2026-10-07T18:44:50.022Z","ageHours":0.1,"stale":false},"measured":8,"ranked":8,"headline":"Fomo leads active wallets 24h at 86.2K (24h) across 8 ranked terminals.","quote":"Fomo leads active wallets 24h at 86.2K (24h) across 8 ranked terminals. Source: OpenChainBench (https://openchainbench.com/benchmarks/trading-platform-wallets).","cite":{"plain":"OpenChainBench. \"Daily active wallets per trading terminal: Fomo vs Axiom vs pump.fun vs GMGN\". Retrieved 2026-10-07. https://openchainbench.com/benchmarks/trading-platform-wallets","bibtex":"@misc{ocb_trading_platform_wallets,\n  author = {OpenChainBench},\n  title  = {Daily active wallets per trading terminal: Fomo vs Axiom vs pump.fun vs GMGN},\n  year   = {2026},\n  url    = {https://openchainbench.com/benchmarks/trading-platform-wallets},\n  note   = {Retrieved 2026-10-07}\n}","apa":"OpenChainBench. (2026). Daily active wallets per trading terminal: Fomo vs Axiom vs pump.fun vs GMGN. Retrieved October 7, 2026, from https://openchainbench.com/benchmarks/trading-platform-wallets","ris":"TY  - GEN\r\nAU  - OpenChainBench\r\nTI  - Daily active wallets per trading terminal: Fomo vs Axiom vs pump.fun vs GMGN\r\nPY  - 2026\r\nUR  - https://openchainbench.com/benchmarks/trading-platform-wallets\r\nY2  - 2026-10-07\r\nER  - \r\n"},"pageUrl":"https://openchainbench.com/benchmarks/trading-platform-wallets","ogImage":"https://openchainbench.com/api/og/trading-platform-wallets","source":"https://github.com/ChainBench/OpenChainBench/tree/dev/harnesses/terminal-activity","methodology":["Source: the public tehcscreener API (https://tehcscreener.com/api), Allium-backed, no key, synced once a day. The harness reads /bots over the full history for the roster and /bots/{bot} for each terminal's per-chain daily series, and publishes one day: the latest the source names.","Wallets: the source's distinct wallet count for that terminal on that chain on that day. Counted per chain. The source also publishes a cross-chain deduplicated count, but only for 2 of the 9 terminals, so this bench uses the per-chain figure everywhere rather than mixing two definitions in one column.","Why the counts are not summed across chains: measured on Fomo, the deduplicated cross-chain count is about 0.6 of the sum of its per-chain counts, because a wallet trading on two chains is one wallet. Adding the tabs together would overstate every multi-chain terminal, so each tab is read on its own.","The two ratios: swaps per wallet is that day's transactions divided by that day's wallets, and volume per wallet is that day's volume divided by the same denominator. Both come from the same row as the count, so all three describe one terminal on one chain on one day.","Latest complete day, not a rolling 24 hours: the source publishes daily and its latest day is normally yesterday. A terminal with no activity on that day carries no figure and reads unresponsive rather than having its last live day carried forward. BasedBot is the live case, with volume on Robinhood and none on Solana.","Stale source: a day more than 3 whole days behind, or a terminal the source stops returning, has its gauges deleted and reads unresponsive. An old figure is never republished as current, because these gauges are scraped every 60 seconds and read through a 24h window, which would average a frozen figure in as though it had just been measured.","Chains: five are offered as tabs, the ones with at least five terminals and meaningful volume. The harness also measures Arc, HyperEVM, Monad, X Layer and Avalanche, which are left off the tab strip because one or two terminals on a chain is a list, not a comparison.","Includes every wallet: bots, MEV searchers and automated traders all count. Not a human-only metric, and a wallet using two terminals on the same day is counted in both.","Not scored here: execution quality and cost. A terminal with many wallets is not thereby a cheap one; benches 268 and 279 measure what a swap costs on each."],"license":"CC-BY-4.0"}