Fomo vs Grider

Side by side OpenChainBench measurements. Identical layout, no editorial verdict, the live data leads. Each panel surfaces the aggregate plus the chain and region breakdowns when the underlying bench exposes them, straight from the Prometheus queries that drive the parent benchmark pages.

Read methodology Last measured Wed, 01 Jul 2026 15:11:55 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Fomo

FOMO is a social trading app on Telegram, iOS and Android that surfaces signals from consistently profitable Hyperliquid traders and routes perp orders via a registered builder code.

Grider

Non custodial grid trading tool for Hyperliquid that automates order placement across predefined price ranges with 24/7 execution.

Side by side measurements

Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard

Trading

Fomo

Leads

$12.9K

p99: $41.77
rank: #4
samples: 7,312

Grider

Trails

$4.48

p99: $0.2239
rank: #78
samples: 254

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.