Metamask vs Sushi

Side by side OpenChainBench measurements. Identical layout, no editorial verdict, the live data leads. Each panel surfaces the aggregate plus the chain and region breakdowns when the underlying bench exposes them, straight from the Prometheus queries that drive the parent benchmark pages.

Read methodology Last measured Wed, 01 Jul 2026 15:14:55 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Metamask

MetaMask is the largest self-custody EVM wallet; its Hyperliquid integration routes perps orders through a registered builder code so users can trade HL from within the wallet.

Sushi

Sushi is a multichain DEX whose Sushi Perps v2 frontend routes orders into the Hyperliquid orderbook via a builder code, layering Sushi points incentives on top.

Side by side measurements

Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard

Trading

Metamask

Leads

$30.2K

p99: $27.19
rank: #2
samples: 13,010

Sushi

Trails

$510.4

p99: $56.71
rank: #33
samples: 243

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.