All benchmarks
AlternativesSourced from Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking

Li.Fi alternatives

Cross-chain bridge + DEX aggregator

Li.Fi is a cross-chain aggregator that stitches together third-party bridges (Stargate, Across, Connext, Hop and others) and DEX aggregators behind a single `/quote` endpoint. The quote response carries a full execution plan with calldata, approval steps and gas estimates, which is convenient for a wallet integration but means the latency reflects fan-out across many underlying providers plus the time to pick a winner. Each upstream has its own SLA, and a slow leg in the cohort drags the quote even when the chosen route is fast. The trade-off is breadth for tail-latency: Li.Fi covers a long tail of bridges that intent-routed competitors do not, but pays for that breadth on the p95 of its `/quote` call. Teams move off when the latency of the fastest route they actually use exceeds what a narrower router can return for the same pair.

Positioning

Li.Fi is a cross-chain routing and orchestration layer that normalises calls across many bridges, DEX aggregators and intent networks behind a unified /quote and /routes API surface, plus a TypeScript SDK and a drop-in widget. Its architectural moat is coverage: routes are searched across a wide set of underlying providers (Across, Hop, Mayan, Allbridge, Symbiosis, Squid, Synapse, CCTP, Wormhole among others), token standards and chain differences are normalised, and the response returns a full execution plan with calldata, approval steps and gas estimates ready for a wallet to sign. That breadth matters when a builder needs any-token-to-any-token support without hand-integrating each bridge, and it does not matter, or actively hurts, when the metric is bridge-quote-latency on a single well-known corridor. The /quote call fans out across underlying providers and picks a winner, so its wall-clock reflects the slowest leg searched, not the fastest route returned. Builders integrating a wallet swap modal, a portfolio rebalance tool or a treasury flow across long-tail chains stay on Li.Fi for the coverage. Teams that route a fixed hot corridor and need sub-second p95 typically front the Li.Fi SDK with a faster narrower router for the paths they actually use.

About Li.Fi: li.fi

Top 5 Li.Fi alternatives

  1. Squid Router logo

    Squid Router

    #1 · Quote latency

    333msp99 858 ms
  2. Near Intents logo

    Near Intents

    #2 · Quote latency

    359msp99 5.22 s
  3. deBridge logo

    deBridge

    #3 · Quote latency

    367msp99 1.79 s
  4. Relay logo

    Relay

    #4 · Quote latency

    790msp99 3.27 s
  5. Mobula logo

    Mobula

    #5 · Quote latency

    813msp99 1.93 s
Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking benchmark ledger. Quote latency per provider, live measured data.
Productp50Trend
Color24h
01
Squid Router logo
333 ms
02
Near Intents logo
359 ms
03
deBridge logo
367 ms
04
Relay logo
790 ms
05
Mobula logo
813 ms
06
Across logo
1.19 s
07
Socket Protocol logo
1.51 s
08
LI.FI logo
1.62 s
Best
333 ms
Median
813 ms
Worst
1.62 s
Spread
6.2×858 ms → 5.33 s
Samples · 24h
1,9388 providers

Quote latency · last 24 hours

Quote latency · last 24 hours

Region
Show
openchainbench.com01.0s2.0s3.0s−24h−18h−12h−6hnowdeBridge332 msSquid Router345 msMobula502 msNear Intents500 msAcross760 ms

Interactive bar chart, distribution view, per-chain drilldowns and chart export on the benchmark page.

Open benchmark

Measurements sourced from Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. Methodology and raw data on the benchmark page.