AlternativesSourced from Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking
Li.Fi alternatives
Cross-chain bridge + DEX aggregator
Li.Fi is a cross-chain aggregator that stitches together third-party bridges (Stargate, Across, Connext, Hop and others) and DEX aggregators behind a single `/quote` endpoint. The quote response carries a full execution plan with calldata, approval steps and gas estimates, which is convenient for a wallet integration but means the latency reflects fan-out across many underlying providers plus the time to pick a winner. Each upstream has its own SLA, and a slow leg in the cohort drags the quote even when the chosen route is fast. The trade-off is breadth for tail-latency: Li.Fi covers a long tail of bridges that intent-routed competitors do not, but pays for that breadth on the p95 of its `/quote` call. Teams move off when the latency of the fastest route they actually use exceeds what a narrower router can return for the same pair.
Positioning
Li.Fi is a cross-chain routing and orchestration layer that normalises calls across many bridges, DEX aggregators and intent networks behind a unified /quote and /routes API surface, plus a TypeScript SDK and a drop-in widget. Its architectural moat is coverage: routes are searched across a wide set of underlying providers (Across, Hop, Mayan, Allbridge, Symbiosis, Squid, Synapse, CCTP, Wormhole among others), token standards and chain differences are normalised, and the response returns a full execution plan with calldata, approval steps and gas estimates ready for a wallet to sign. That breadth matters when a builder needs any-token-to-any-token support without hand-integrating each bridge, and it does not matter, or actively hurts, when the metric is bridge-quote-latency on a single well-known corridor. The /quote call fans out across underlying providers and picks a winner, so its wall-clock reflects the slowest leg searched, not the fastest route returned. Builders integrating a wallet swap modal, a portfolio rebalance tool or a treasury flow across long-tail chains stay on Li.Fi for the coverage. Teams that route a fixed hot corridor and need sub-second p95 typically front the Li.Fi SDK with a faster narrower router for the paths they actually use.
About Li.Fi: li.fi
Top 5 Li.Fi alternatives
| Product | p50 | Trend | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Color | № | 24h | ||||||||
| 01 | 171 ms | |||||||||
| 02 | 345 ms | |||||||||
| 03 | 348 ms | |||||||||
| 04 | 357 ms | |||||||||
| 05 | 511 ms | |||||||||
| 06 | 631 ms | |||||||||
| 07 | 1.57 s | |||||||||
| 08 | 1.75 s | |||||||||
- Best
- 171 ms
- Median
- 511 ms
- Worst
- 1.75 s
- Spread
- 10.9×880 ms → 9.61 s
- Samples · 24h
- 2,2958 providers
Quote latency · last 24 hours
Quote latency · last 24 hours
Region
Show
Interactive bar chart, distribution view, per-chain drilldowns and chart export on the benchmark page.
Open benchmarkMeasurements sourced from Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. Methodology and raw data on the benchmark page.