Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage
RPCs| Provider | Wallet call latency | Chains covered | Method coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 48 Club Privacy RPC | 21 ms | 1 | 7 |
| Flashbots Protect | 100 ms | 1 | 5 |
48 Club Privacy RPC vs Flashbots Protect
48 Club Privacy RPC leads on the only live benchmark. 48 Club Privacy RPC wins on Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage (21 ms vs 100 ms).
48 Club Privacy RPC
48 Club is a BNB Chain validator collective behind the KOGE token. Its Privacy RPC, successor of Puissant, routes BSC transactions privately through its own validators to prevent frontrunning.
Flashbots Protect
Flashbots Protect RPC sends transactions through a private mempool, shielding them from sandwich attacks. Read calls go to a standard Ethereum node behind the proxy.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
48 Club Privacy RPC vs Flashbots Protect: which one is better?
48 Club Privacy RPC and Flashbots Protect are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. 48 Club Privacy RPC leads on Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, 48 Club Privacy RPC or Flashbots Protect?
On the Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage benchmark, 48 Club Privacy RPC leads at 21 ms versus Flashbots Protect at 100 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the 48 Club Privacy RPC vs Flashbots Protect comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.