Fastest free Abstract RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency
RPCsAbstract Foundation
No data in window
Thirdweb
No data in window
Per region
| Region | Abstract Foundation | Thirdweb |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 325 ms | 634 ms |
| EU-West | 326 ms | 637 ms |
| Singapore | 326 ms | 629 ms |
Abstract Foundation vs Thirdweb
Abstract Foundation leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Thirdweb on 0. Abstract Foundation wins on Fastest free Abstract RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency (326 ms vs 628 ms).
Abstract Foundation
Abstract Foundation's official public RPC (api.mainnet.abs.xyz) for the ZK Stack validium L2 dedicated to consumer applications and NFTs (chain 2741). Standard EVM JSON-RPC, keyless, rate-limited per IP.
Thirdweb
ThirdWeb operates a keyless public RPC gateway at `<chainid>.rpc.thirdweb.com` covering 2000+ EVM chains via chain-id routing. Free tier is rate-limited per IP with no signup; paid tiers unlock higher throughput and dedicated endpoints. Used keyless across 13 chains on the RPC latency cluster (arbitrum, ethereum, polygon, optimism, base, bnb, avalanche, linea, worldchain, kaia, ink, opbnb + more).
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Abstract Foundation vs Thirdweb: which one is better?
Abstract Foundation and Thirdweb are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Abstract Foundation leads on Fastest free Abstract RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest free abstract rpc, live no-key evm endpoint latency, Abstract Foundation or Thirdweb?
On the Fastest free Abstract RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency benchmark, Abstract Foundation leads at 326 ms versus Thirdweb at 628 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Abstract Foundation vs Thirdweb comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.