Acala (RPC-0) vs Acala (RPC-2)

Acala (RPC-0) leads on the only live benchmark. Acala (RPC-0) wins on Fastest free Acala RPC, live no-key endpoint latency (4 ms vs 4 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
Acala (RPC-0) logo
Acala (RPC-0)

Acala official public RPC node 0 (acala-rpc-0.aca-api.network). Keyless Substrate JSON-RPC interface for the Acala DeFi parachain on Polkadot.

Acala (RPC-2) logo
Acala (RPC-2)

Acala official public RPC node 2 (acala-rpc-2.aca-api.network). Keyless Substrate JSON-RPC interface for the Acala DeFi parachain on Polkadot.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Acala (RPC-0) vs Acala (RPC-2): which one is better?

Acala (RPC-0) and Acala (RPC-2) are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Acala (RPC-0) leads on Fastest free Acala RPC, live no-key endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Acala (RPC-0) or Acala (RPC-2)?

On the Fastest free Acala RPC, live no-key endpoint latency benchmark, Acala (RPC-0) leads at 4 ms versus Acala (RPC-2) at 4 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Acala (RPC-0) vs Acala (RPC-2) comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.