Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingAevo
Trails$4.35M
- p99
- $5.24M
- rank
- #16
- samples
- 2,880
Ondo Perps
Leads$146.53M
- p99
- $184.86M
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 1,345
24h perp volume
Aevon/aOndo Perpsn/a
Aevo vs Ondo Perps
Split decision: Aevo leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (238 vs 65); Ondo Perps leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($146.53M vs $4.35M).
Aevo
OP Stack perp DEX with deep options support, event-driven flow.
Ondo Perps
Ondo Perps is Ondo Finance's perpetuals exchange (live since June 2026): an off-chain matching engine running in Intel SGX enclaves with on-chain custody on Ethereum and Arbitrum, USDC and Ondo tokenized stocks as collateral, and 60+ markets across US equities, ETFs, commodities, indices, FX and crypto.
Side by side measurements
Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue
TradingAevo
Leads238
- p99
- 238
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 2,880
Ondo Perps
Trails65
- p99
- 65
- rank
- #13
- samples
- 1,344
Active markets
Aevon/aOndo Perpsn/a
Frequently asked questions
Aevo vs Ondo Perps: which one is better?
Aevo and Ondo Perps are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aevo leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. Ondo Perps leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher active markets, Aevo or Ondo Perps?
On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Aevo leads at 238 versus Ondo Perps at 65. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Aevo or Ondo Perps?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Ondo Perps leads at $146.53M versus Aevo at $4.35M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Aevo vs Ondo Perps comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.