Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingAevo
Trails$2.62M
- p99
- $8.02M
- rank
- #15
- samples
- 2,880
Polymarket
Leads$83.05M
- p99
- $91.77M
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 2,880
Aevo vs Polymarket
Split decision: Aevo leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues (233 vs 67); Polymarket leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($83.05M vs $2.62M).
Aevo
OP Stack perp DEX with deep options support, event-driven flow.
Polymarket
The largest crypto prediction market, settled on Polygon via UMA optimistic oracle. CLOB-style order book hosted on the Polymarket gateway with sub-second publish latency for live odds.
Side by side measurements
Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues
TradingAevo
Leads233
- p99
- 234
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 2,880
Polymarket
Trails67
- p99
- 67
- rank
- #12
- samples
- 2,880
Frequently asked questions
Aevo vs Polymarket: which one is better?
Aevo and Polymarket are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aevo leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues. Polymarket leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is more active, Aevo or Polymarket?
On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count across 14 venues benchmark, Aevo leads at 233 versus Polymarket at 67. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is cheaper, Aevo or Polymarket?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Polymarket leads at $83.05M versus Aevo at $2.62M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Aevo vs Polymarket comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.