Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingAevo
Trails$1.34M
- p99
- $1.81M
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 5,760
Polymarket
Leads$36.30M
- p99
- $76.44M
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 5,760
Aevo vs Polymarket
Aevo leads on 0 of 2 shared benchmarks, Polymarket on 2. Polymarket wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($36.30M vs $1.34M), Perp DEX open interest, live USD notional ranked ($26.26M vs $9.57M).
Aevo
OP Stack perp DEX with deep options support, event-driven flow.
Polymarket
The largest crypto prediction market, settled on Polygon via UMA optimistic oracle. CLOB-style order book hosted on the Polymarket gateway with sub-second publish latency for live odds.
Side by side measurements
Perp DEX open interest, live USD notional ranked
TradingAevo
Trails$9.57M
- p99
- $9.68M
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 5,760
Polymarket
Leads$26.26M
- p99
- $26.48M
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 5,760
Frequently asked questions
Aevo vs Polymarket: which one is better?
Aevo and Polymarket are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Polymarket leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on perp dex volume share, live 24h notional ranked, Aevo or Polymarket?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Polymarket leads at $36.30M versus Aevo at $1.34M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Aevo vs Polymarket comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.