Anchorage By Figment vs HyperCN X hlscan

Name: Anchorage By Figment vs HyperCN X hlscan OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Anchorage By Figment vs HyperCN X hlscan on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.

Read methodology Last measured Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:26:48 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Anchorage By Figment

HyperCN X hlscan

Side by side measurements

Hyperliquid validator leaderboard: live net APR, uptime, commission

Blockchains

Anchorage By Figment

Leads

2.01 %

p99: 2.01%
rank: #27
samples: 2,524,170,000

HyperCN X hlscan

No data in window

net_yield = predictedApr.day x uptimeFraction from /info validatorSummaries. No MEV layer at the validator level on Hyperliquid; the centralised sequencer captures order-flow value upstream. Jailed validators land at 0 bps regardless of published APR. APRs cluster at 200 to 225 bps across the active set; commission rate is the primary differentiator for delegators.

Frequently asked questions

Anchorage By Figment vs HyperCN X hlscan: which one is better?

Anchorage By Figment and HyperCN X hlscan are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.

How is the Anchorage By Figment vs HyperCN X hlscan comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.