Ankr vs Glif

Ankr leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Glif on 0. Ankr wins on Fastest free Filecoin RPC, live no-key FEVM endpoint latency (6 ms vs 248 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
Ankr logo
Ankr

Multi-chain RPC service covering 65+ chains on the freemium tier. One API key across chains; some networks are premium-gated.

Glif logo
Glif

Glif is a community-operated Filecoin node infrastructure provider. Their public endpoint (api.node.glif.io/rpc/v1) is the canonical keyless FEVM gateway for Filecoin mainnet (chain 314).

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Ankr vs Glif: which one is better?

Ankr and Glif are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ankr leads on Fastest free Filecoin RPC, live no-key FEVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest free filecoin rpc, live no-key fevm endpoint latency, Ankr or Glif?

On the Fastest free Filecoin RPC, live no-key FEVM endpoint latency benchmark, Ankr leads at 6 ms versus Glif at 248 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Ankr vs Glif comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.