Ankr vs Glif

Ankr leads on the only live benchmark. Ankr wins on Fastest free Filecoin RPC, live no-key FEVM endpoint latency (49 ms vs 122 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
Ankr logo
Ankr

Multi-chain RPC service covering 65+ chains on the freemium tier. One API key across chains; some networks are premium-gated.

Glif logo
Glif

Glif is a community-operated Filecoin node infrastructure provider. Their public endpoint (api.node.glif.io/rpc/v1) is the canonical keyless FEVM gateway for Filecoin mainnet (chain 314).

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Ankr vs Glif: which one is better?

Ankr and Glif are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Ankr leads on Fastest free Filecoin RPC, live no-key FEVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Ankr or Glif?

On the Fastest free Filecoin RPC, live no-key FEVM endpoint latency benchmark, Ankr leads at 49 ms versus Glif at 122 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Ankr vs Glif comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.