Fastest free ApeChain RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency
RPCsApeChain
No data in window
Thirdweb
No data in window
Per region
| Region | ApeChain | Thirdweb |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 192 ms | 565 ms |
| EU-West | 189 ms | 543 ms |
| Singapore | 193 ms | 603 ms |
ApeChain vs Thirdweb
ApeChain leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Thirdweb on 0. ApeChain wins on Fastest free ApeChain RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency (191 ms vs 572 ms).
ApeChain
ApeChain's official public RPC (rpc.apechain.com/http) for the Arbitrum Orbit L3 operated by Yuga Labs / ApeDAO, APE gas token (chain 33139). Standard EVM JSON-RPC, keyless, rate-limited per IP.
Thirdweb
ThirdWeb operates a keyless public RPC gateway at `<chainid>.rpc.thirdweb.com` covering 2000+ EVM chains via chain-id routing. Free tier is rate-limited per IP with no signup; paid tiers unlock higher throughput and dedicated endpoints. Used keyless across 13 chains on the RPC latency cluster (arbitrum, ethereum, polygon, optimism, base, bnb, avalanche, linea, worldchain, kaia, ink, opbnb + more).
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
ApeChain vs Thirdweb: which one is better?
ApeChain and Thirdweb are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. ApeChain leads on Fastest free ApeChain RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest free apechain rpc, live no-key evm endpoint latency, ApeChain or Thirdweb?
On the Fastest free ApeChain RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency benchmark, ApeChain leads at 191 ms versus Thirdweb at 572 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the ApeChain vs Thirdweb comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.