ApexLiquid vs FOMO

Name: ApexLiquid vs FOMO OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

FOMO leads on the only live benchmark. FOMO wins on Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard ($21.2K vs $314.37).

Read methodology Last measured Wed, 26 Aug 2026 22:28:35 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

ApexLiquid

ApexLiquid is a Telegram bot and smart wallet that auto copies on chain smart money traders on Hyperliquid in roughly one second, routing mirrored fills via a registered builder code.

FOMO

FOMO is a multi-chain trading app (Solana, Base, BNB Chain, and more) for memecoins and perps. It provides social copy-trading, onchain signals, and routes swaps through pump.fun, Raydium, and other DEX pools.

Side by side measurements

Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard

Trading

Provider	Builder fees collected	Volume routed	Users 24h	Effective fee bps	Time since last fill
ApexLiquid	$314.37	$647.8K	91	0.049%	51.6 s
FOMO	$21.2K	$47.02M	2,234	0.045%	6.1 s

Ranking is by raw builder fee revenue in USD, not by value for users. Bigger number means more fees collected via the on-chain builder code field. For the trader cost perspective, switch to the Effective fee bps companion tab. Native Hyperliquid UI orders carry no builder code and are excluded. Data from a local hl node tailing every fill on mainnet.

Frequently asked questions

ApexLiquid vs FOMO: which one is better?

ApexLiquid and FOMO are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. FOMO leads on Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, ApexLiquid or FOMO?

On the Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard benchmark, FOMO leads at $21.2K versus ApexLiquid at $314.37. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the ApexLiquid vs FOMO comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

FOMO vs pump.fun

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.