ApexLiquid vs Nautilus Trader

Name: ApexLiquid vs Nautilus Trader OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

ApexLiquid vs Nautilus Trader on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.

Read methodology Last measured Sat, 22 Aug 2026 02:13:05 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

ApexLiquid

ApexLiquid is a Telegram bot and smart wallet that auto copies on chain smart money traders on Hyperliquid in roughly one second, routing mirrored fills via a registered builder code.

Nautilus Trader

Open source Rust native production grade trading engine with a Hyperliquid integration for live perpetual futures execution.

Side by side measurements

Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard

Trading

Provider	Volume routed	Users 24h	Effective fee bps	Time since last fill
ApexLiquid	$2.36M	117	0.048%	2.2 s
Nautilus Trader	$3.01M	13	-	4.0 s

Ranking is by raw builder fee revenue in USD, not by value for users. Bigger number means more fees collected via the on-chain builder code field. For the trader cost perspective, switch to the Effective fee bps companion tab. Native Hyperliquid UI orders carry no builder code and are excluded. Data from a local hl node tailing every fill on mainnet.

Frequently asked questions

ApexLiquid vs Nautilus Trader: which one is better?

ApexLiquid and Nautilus Trader are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.

How is the ApexLiquid vs Nautilus Trader comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.