Aptos vs Neutron

Side by side OpenChainBench measurements. Identical layout, no editorial verdict, the live data leads. Each panel surfaces the aggregate plus the chain and region breakdowns when the underlying bench exposes them, straight from the Prometheus queries that drive the parent benchmark pages.

Read methodology Last measured Wed, 01 Jul 2026 15:37:13 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Aptos

Neutron

CosmWasm smart-contract chain secured by Cosmos Hub via Interchain Security. CometBFT consensus with deterministic finality per block, around 2-second block time. TokenFactory denom_creation_fee is empty, so creating a new denom costs only gas.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 21 L1 and L2 chains

Blockchains

Aptos

Trails

$0.0863

p99: $0.0893
rank: #16

Neutron

Leads

$4.12e-7

p99: $4.29e-7
rank: #1

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.