BlockchainsLive

Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 7 non-EVM L1 chains

Osmosis leads token deployment cost usd at $0.000984 (24h) on Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 7 non-EVM L1 chains. Live USD cost to bring a fungible token into existence on each chain, using that chain's canonical method. 7 non-EVM L1 chains, 5 minute refresh, no transactions broadcast.

TL;DR. As of , Osmosis leads token deployment cost usd at $0.000984 (24h) on Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 7 non-EVM L1 chains. Source: OpenChainBench, https://openchainbench.com/benchmarks/token-deployment-cost.

This page answers a question every memecoin founder, RWA issuer and non-EVM L1 marketing team asks. How much does it actually cost in dollars to create a token on each non-EVM chain right now. We track 7 non-EVM L1 chains in parallel and refresh the number every 5 minutes. Solana uses the SPL mint plus the Associated Token Account plus the Metaplex metadata account so the comparison is fair against ERC20 which embeds name and symbol natively. Sui and Aptos use Move publish gas budgets. Cardano reads coins_per_utxo_size from koios and applies the Conway minUTxO formula. Stellar uses the canonical issuer plus distribution plus trustline two account flow at protocol-minimum reserves. Cosmos TokenFactory chains (Osmosis, Injective) read denom_creation_fee from the LCD. Every number is reproducible from source. No transactions are broadcast. EVM chains are excluded from this leaderboard for now while we finalise the canonical OpenZeppelin v5 ERC20 artifact bytecode used in eth_estimateGas.

Methodology

Every 5 minutes the harness asks each of 7 non-EVM L1 chains what it would cost right now to create a standard fungible token. For Solana it reads rent exemption for the SPL mint, the Associated Token Account and the Metaplex metadata account. For Sui and Aptos it uses the reference gas price multiplied by a pinned Move publish budget. For Cosmos TokenFactory chains (Osmosis, Injective) it reads denom_creation_fee from the LCD. For Cardano it reads coins_per_utxo_size and applies the Conway min UTxO formula. For Stellar it reads base_reserve_in_stroops and base_fee and prices the canonical issuer plus distribution plus trustline two account flow. No transaction is broadcast on any chain. The 7 numbers are published as Prometheus gauges with chain and layer labels. EVM chains are excluded pending a canonical OZ v5 ERC20 artifact.

Token deployment cost USD by chain

Live p50 over the last 24 hours, ranked lowest first. Each chain has its own consensus mechanism. The explainer below matches what the harness actually measures.

Osmosis token deployment cost usd

$0.000984 p50 over the last 24 hours · TokenFactory denom_creation_fee.

Aptos token deployment cost usd

$0.0915 p50 over the last 24 hours · FA standard publish, 150k gas budget.

Cardano token deployment cost usd

$0.1931 p50 over the last 24 hours · Native asset min-UTxO, deterministic.

Sui token deployment cost usd

$0.3559 p50 over the last 24 hours · Move coin module publish, 5M MIST budget.

Stellar token deployment cost usd

$0.4452 p50 over the last 24 hours · Issuer + distribution + trustline, 2-account flow.

Injective token deployment cost usd

$0.5070 p50 over the last 24 hours · TokenFactory denom_creation_fee, 0.1 INJ flat.

Solana token deployment cost usd

$0.6788 p50 over the last 24 hours · SPL mint + ATA + Metaplex metadata.

Frequently asked

What does this benchmark measure?

The live USD cost to create a fungible token on each of the 7 tracked non-EVM L1 chains, refreshed every 5 minutes, using each chain's canonical and most used method. SPL mint plus ATA plus Metaplex metadata account for Solana, Move publish for Sui and Aptos, TokenFactory MsgCreateDenom for Osmosis and Injective, native asset minting policy for Cardano, two account asset issuance for Stellar.

Which chains are tracked?

7 non-EVM L1 chains: Solana, Sui, Aptos, Osmosis, Injective, Cardano, Stellar.

Why are EVM chains not tracked here?

The harness path for EVM chains currently ships a placeholder ERC20 init bytecode to eth_estimateGas, which understates the real deploy cost of the canonical OpenZeppelin v5 ERC20 by roughly 30 to 500x depending on chain. Rather than publish misleading numbers, we removed the EVM leg until we finalise the real OZ v5 artifact and re-enable it in a follow-up.

Is the comparison fair across chains?

As fair as the underlying chains allow. Token creation means structurally different things in each ecosystem. We do not pretend the numbers are perfectly equivalent. Instead we publish exactly what the canonical and most used method costs in dollars on each chain, plus the formula and inputs for every value so readers can adjust. The methodology field lists the precise method per chain.

Why is Osmosis showing near zero?

Osmosis TokenFactory has set its denom_creation_fee parameter to an empty list, meaning the only cost is the gas to execute MsgCreateDenom (roughly one tenth of a cent at current gas prices, well below our display precision). We render this as less than zero point zero zero one dollar with a tooltip explaining no protocol level creation fee. Injective by contrast charges a flat zero point one INJ for a tokenfactory denom.

Is the Solana number really fair compared to ERC20?

Yes. Earlier versions of the benchmark only counted the bare 82 byte mint account rent, which understated the realistic cost by about 2.5 times. The current methodology also includes the 165 byte Associated Token Account for the initial holder and the 679 byte Metaplex Token Metadata account that holds name, symbol and URI. EVM ERC20 deployments embed name and symbol in the contract storage natively, so adding the Solana metadata account is the apples to apples adjustment. A bare mint without metadata would not be discoverable in Phantom, Jupiter or any wallet UI.

Why is Cardano always similar?

The Cardano min UTxO formula is deterministic. The coins_per_utxo_size protocol parameter is set by governance and moves rarely. A standard native asset bundle (32 byte policy hash plus short asset name) sits around 70 bytes, and the on chain mint transaction fee is a few cents of ADA. The USD figure on the leaderboard moves with ADA price, not with congestion.

Can I cite a value from this page?

Yes. Every number is a live Prometheus query against the OpenChainBench gateway. The harness source is open at the link in the source field below. Cite the value, the chain and the timestamp at the top of the page.

Why publish a live cost when most readers will see a one off snapshot?

Because deploying a token is a one off decision and the operator wants the cost at the time of decision, not last quarter's average. The bench is the only public source that publishes this number live with reproducible methodology. Static blog posts go stale within hours when gas prices move.

Source code github.com/ChainBench/OpenChainBench/tree/main/harnesses/token-deployment-cost