Trading Apps
Trading app benchmarks
Swap volume routed through each trading app and Telegram bot, every chain summed, per closed UTC day, with the per-chain split and 7 / 30 day trends. Below it, what each app charged on that volume, how its fills came out and how its users rate it. Live data, no marketing claims.
Cross-chain daily volume · bench 267
Cohort volume, latest closed day
$451.5M
each app's latest day, up to 2026-10-01
Cohort volume 7d
$2.95B
Cohort volume 30d
$17.90B
Leader, last day
Axiom
$147.9M · 33% of cohort
Daily volume, every chain summed · closed UTC days
UTC days, every chain summed
Series start where DeFiLlama's data starts: GMGN since 20 Sep 2023; o1.exchange since 11 Oct 2025; 12 others since 5 May 2026 to 13 Aug 2026, when DeFiLlama added their adapters (not backfilled). Earlier years are not published for these apps.
| App | Chains, last day | Last day | 7d | 7d Δ | 30d | Share 30d | Last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Solana 91% · Robinhood Chain 6% · +1 | $147.9M | $742.0M6/7d | n/a | $2.66B29/30d | 14.9% | |
| 2 | Settled on Solana · cross-chain via Relay | $143.1M | $1.12B | 15% | $7.28B | 40.7% | |
| 3 | BSC 49% · Solana 25% · +9 | $116.5M | $753.8M | n/a | $6.86B29/30d | 38.3% | |
| 4 | Solana | $21.7M | $130.1M | 16% | $453.7M | 2.5% | |
| 5 | Solana | $13.2M | $147.6M | 64% | $416.9M | 2.3% | |
| 6 | Solana | $3.4M | $27.0M | 8% | $99.2M | 0.6% | |
| 7 | Solana | $1.3M | $9.8M | 51% | $32.6M | 0.2% | |
| 8 | Solana 97% · BSC 2% · +1 | $1.1M | $9.6M | 31% | $27.4M | 0.2% | |
| 9 | BSC 79% · Solana 20% · +1 | $958K | $5.3M | 68% | $12.4M | 0.1% | |
| 10 | Solana | $796K | $5.3M | 10% | $20.2M | 0.1% | |
| 11 | Solana | $631K | $2.0M | 44% | $13.5M | 0.1% | |
| 12 | Solana | $444K | $1.5M | 56% | $12.1M | 0.1% | |
| 13 | Base 75% · BSC 25% · +1 | $182K | $1.3M | 2% | $5.6M | 0.0% | |
| 14 | Solana | $139K | $796K | 25% | $3.8M | 0.0% |
Where the cohort traded, each app on its latest closed day
Solana 77.6%BSC 13.7%Robinhood Chain 7.4%Ethereum 0.7%Base 0.3%X Layer 0.2%Arc 0.2%Hyperliquid L1 0.0%
Source: DeFiLlama dexs adapters (Trading App and Telegram Bot categories), per closed UTC day, every chain the adapter covers. Each row ends on the app's latest closed day: most adapters are Dune queries that publish a day 10 to 20 hours after it closes, so before mid-day UTC some rows carry the day before (dated in the Last day column). Re-read hourly; DeFiLlama restates the last day for about 24 h. Bench 267, as of Fri, 02 Oct 2026 21:44:46 UTC.
Fill quality · bench 268
What a swap really costs on each terminal: real user transactions read on-chain, valued at the pool's arrival price, split into terminal fee, network, pump.fun and pool costs, plus the share of transactions that fail.
Cheapest fill, median
Binance
203 bps per swap · 95 % interval 199 to 214 bps · 202 swaps
Most expensive, median
Bloom
493 bps per swap · 95 % interval 459 to 534 bps · 291 swaps
Failed swaps
3.7%
all terminals, share of swap attempts
Swaps sampled
3,505
12 ranked · 13 published of 15
| Terminal | Median swap | Value lost, median | Lost / swap, median | App fee | Network | Pool | Protocol | Failed | p90 | Swaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $50.0 | 203 bps 2.03 %199–214 | $1.02 | 48 | 11 | 105 | 0 | 4.4% | 389 bps | 202 |
| 2 | $15.1 | 203 bps 2.03 %176–218 | $0.31 | 0 | 2 | 32 | 122 | 4.4% | 510 bps | 271 |
| 3 | $15.5 | 339 bps 3.39 %334–345 | $0.52 | 143 | 27 | 40 | 84 | 0.7% | 627 bps | 592 |
| 4 | $34.8 | 340 bps 3.40 %324–349 | $1.18 | 99 | 24 | 108 | 51 | 2.1% | 733 bps | 557 |
| 5 | $29.1 | 362 bps 3.62 %348–390 | $1.05 | 95 | 14 | 57 | 141 | 6.0% | 857 bps | 243 |
| 6 | $36.9 | 368 bps 3.68 %351–407 | $1.36 | 99 | 50 | 60 | 100 | 1.8% | 749 bps | 137 |
| 7 | $38.5 | 379 bps 3.79 %317–446 | $1.46 | 99 | 26 | 54 | 119 | 7.4% | 817 bps | 106 |
| 8 | $30.7 | 399 bps 3.99 %371–453 | $1.23 | 98 | 16 | 50 | 131 | 4.2% | 810 bps | 130 |
| 9 | $21.8 | 409 bps 4.09 %366–459 | $0.89 | 97 | 88 | 40 | 102 | 4.4% | 889 bps | 127 |
| 10 | $70.4 | 445 bps 4.45 %415–488 | $3.13 | 98 | 22 | 60 | 119 | 4.8% | 769 bps | 139 |
| 11 | $61.1 | 474 bps 4.74 %460–492 | $2.90 | 98 | 66 | 117 | 89 | 0.5% | 872 bps | 470 |
| 12 | $62.2 | 493 bps 4.93 %459–534 | $3.07 | 99 | 73 | 130 | 128 | — | 1011 bps | 291 |
| · | $15.1 | 260 bps 2.60 %247–290 | $0.39 | 85 | 15 | 34 | 93 | 2.7% | 739 bps | 111 |
| · | $29.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.2% | — | 127 |
| · | $74.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.3% | — | 2 |
Every figure here is a median, not an average: losses have a long right tail, so averaging the sampled rows returns a larger number (pump.fun, 250 bps median against a 360 bps mean). Split columns are medians of each cost in basis points of the trade (100 bps = 1 %), each chain's median weighted by its flow on a multi-chain product; they do not sum to the median loss, the per-swap sums do (audit table).Terminal feeNetwork (tx fee + tips, origin gas)Relay (bridge fees + spread)Protocol fees (launchpad, curve, referrals)Pool (LP fee + impact, hops)
Audit the sampled swaps · the 3000 most recent transactions, one per row with its Solscan link, loss and cost split, on the bench page
Real user swaps read on-chain (Solana: each terminal's fee-wallet and program feed; EVM: the terminals' routers and blocks read in full; 400 drawn at random per terminal per day, 1,000 on the EVM rows, every attempt counted for the fail rate), valued at the pool's state before the trade (exact where the pool's formula is known: PumpSwap, Raydium, Launchpad, DLMM, four.meme, the EVM pools; the previous trade on the same pool within 60 s elsewhere; swaps without one keep their cost split but no loss figure). Loss = 1 − value received / value given, in basis points of the trade; terminal, network and other are exact from balance deltas, the tx fee and inclusion tips included. Published from 50 priced swaps pooled (a chain row or a single-chain product from 25), ranked from 100. Bench 268, rolling 24 h, as of Fri, 02 Oct 2026 22:42:37 UTC.
What each app charges, per platform
The commission each app collected on its latest closed UTC day and the take rate that implies, next to how its users rate it. Commission is the app's own cut from DeFiLlama's fees adapter, not the total fees paid on the trade. Each row covers whatever chains its own adapter covers, which the Chains cell shows.
Highest commission, latest day
FOMO · $785K
Top-rated app
Fomo · 4.8 / 5
Platforms tracked
7
Active benchmarks
6
Platform comparison
| Platform | Chains | Commission | Take Rate | App Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Settled on Solana · cross-chain via Relay | $785K | 0.55% | 4.8 / 5 | |
| Solana 91% · Robinhood Chain 6% · +1 | $706K | 0.48% | — | |
| BSC 49% · Solana 25% · +9 | $662K | 0.57% | 3.6 / 5 | |
| Solana | $160K | 1.21% | 4.7 / 5 | |
| Solana | $71K | 0.33% | — | |
| Solana | $27K | 0.79% | — | |
| Solana | $14K | 1.05% | — |
Best value per column highlighted in green. Sorted by the first column where more is better. Volume is in the bench 267 table above (one figure per app, cross-chain). Chains from bench 267 (each app's latest closed UTC day), which is also where each row's breadth is shown. An app with no figure in any column is not listed. Hover column headers for methodology notes.
All benchmarks
Volume & activity
Launchpads
App store