Trading terminal leaderboard: what GMGN, Axiom, Fomo and Terminal route and what they charge
Routed volume, fee revenue and observed take rate per trading terminal, over one day, seven days or thirty, on one chain or across every chain.
TL;DR. As of , Fomo leads daily volume at $151.59M (24h) across 7 ranked terminals. Source: OpenChainBench, https://openchainbench.com/benchmarks/trading-platform-wars.
Read this carefully
Volume routed through each terminal's own interface, not volume on the tokens it trades: a swap on a pump.fun token executed through Axiom counts for Axiom here and for pump.fun on bench 200. From the public tehcscreener API, which is Allium-backed. Fee revenue is what the source reports as fees, which is more than the terminal's own commission; bench 203 explains what that is and is not.
A trading terminal makes money on flow, so the two figures that describe one are how much it routes and what it keeps per dollar. This page puts them side by side for eight terminals, over a day, a week or a month, on one chain or across all of them. The spread is wide in both directions: the largest terminal routes more than a hundred times the smallest, and take rates run from nothing at all to above one percent.
Methodology
The harness reads the tehcscreener /bots endpoint and publishes routed volume, fee revenue and transaction counts per terminal per chain, summed over 1, 7 and 30 days. The take rate is total fees over the volume of the days whose fees could be measured, so it is volume-weighted and never a mean of daily rates. This bench read DeFiLlama until 2026-10-07. It now reads tehcscreener, which is the single source behind every bench on the /trading-apps hub. The move removed a contradiction: the hub previously showed a DeFiLlama take rate and a tehcscreener fee rate in the same table, disagreeing by up to a factor of two on the same terminal.
Results: 7 terminals ranked by Daily volume (24h)
| № | Terminals | Value | Volume 7d | Volume 30d | Fee revenue | Success |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fomo | $151.59M | $1.20B | $6.38B | $663.5K | 100.00% |
| 2 | Axiom | $137.20M | $904.21M | $3.81B | $1.21M | 100.00% |
| 3 | GMGN | $69.61M | $573.67M | $3.67B | $713.6K | 100.00% |
| 4 | pump.fun | $39.69M | $279.22M | $1.15B | $4,404.87 | 100.00% |
| 5 | Terminal | $20.96M | $140.95M | $565.54M | $235.7K | 100.00% |
| 6 | Trojan | $3.35M | $23.75M | $108.53M | $37.6K | 100.00% |
| 7 | Photon | $1.32M | $8.21M | $32.71M | $13.5K | 100.00% |
Frequently asked
Is this the same as the volume on bench 200?
No, and the two should not be added. This counts what each terminal routed through its own interface. Bench 200 counts trading on each launchpad's tokens whoever routed it. One swap can appear on both, under a terminal here and under a launchpad there.
Why did this move off DeFiLlama?
So that every bench on the /trading-apps hub reads one source. The hub previously showed a DeFiLlama take rate next to a tehcscreener fee rate, disagreeing by up to two times on the same terminal, which is a contradiction a reader has no way to resolve.
What does the fee revenue column actually count?
More than the terminal's own commission. Measured against published schedules it runs above them, and the source does not document what it includes. Bench 203 carries the same caveat and the same number per dollar routed.
Source code github.com/ChainBench/OpenChainBench/tree/dev/harnesses/terminal-activity