TradingLive

Launchpad leaderboard: pump.fun vs Pons Family vs Stonk.fun vs long.xyz

Trading volume on each launchpad's tokens for one complete day, whoever routed the trade. Across Solana, Robinhood Chain and Arc, or one chain at a time.

TL;DR. As of , pump.fun leads 24h volume at $688.35M (24h) across 7 ranked launchpads. Source: OpenChainBench, https://openchainbench.com/benchmarks/launchpad-wars.

Read this carefully

Volume on a launchpad's tokens for one complete UTC day, from the public tehcscreener API, which is Allium-backed. This counts every trade on those tokens whoever routed it, so it is not the launchpad's own interface volume: pump.fun appears on this page and on the terminal benches with figures an order of magnitude apart, and both are correct for what they measure. This source's figures diverge from other indexers in both directions; the methodology gives the numbers.

A launchpad is where a token is created and first traded, and its volume is every trade on those tokens afterwards, whoever routed them. That makes it a different question from how much a trading terminal routes, and a much larger number: pump.fun's tokens carry more volume in a day than every other pad on this page combined, while its own app routes a fraction of that. This page ranks the pads by that first figure, across Solana, Robinhood Chain and Arc.

Methodology

The harness reads /launchpads from the tehcscreener API once per cycle and publishes each pad's volume, launches and trade count for the latest complete day as launchpad_volume_usd, launchpad_tokens_launched and launchpad_trade_txns. The all-chains slice is a real total: a pad running on two chains is one pad with two markets. This bench read Mobula until 2026-10-07 and covered eight Solana pads. It now reads tehcscreener, which is the single source behind every bench on the /trading-apps hub. Six pads left the cohort because this source does not cover them (Meteora DBC, NOXA Fun, Bankr, LetsCash, dontblink and Raydium Launchlab) and five joined, three of them outside Solana. A pad the source does not carry is removed rather than published as zero.

Results: 7 launchpads ranked by 24h volume (24h)

Launchpad leaderboard: pump.fun vs Pons Family vs Stonk.fun vs long.xyz: 24h volume per launchpad (24h).
№LaunchpadsValueSuccess
1pump.fun$688.35M100.00%
2Pons Family$68.43M100.00%
3Stonk.fun$50.05M100.00%
4long.xyz$14.83M100.00%
5LetsBonk$4.66M100.00%
6ArgusPad$2.67M100.00%
7Flap$539.3K100.00%

Frequently asked

Why is pump.fun's figure here so much bigger than on the trading app benches?

Because they measure different things. This page counts every trade on tokens that launched on pump.fun, whoever routed it. The terminal benches count what came through pump.fun's own interface. Most people trade pump.fun tokens through Axiom, GMGN, Photon or a Telegram bot, so the first number is an order of magnitude larger.

Does this agree with other sources?

Not on pump.fun. On 2026-10-07 this source said $688.4M for the day where DeFiLlama said $185.0M and Mobula said $188.4M, and those two agreed with each other to within 1.8%. On another pad, flap, this source reads far lower instead. The site publishes this source by decision and states the gap rather than hiding it.

Why did six launchpads disappear?

Meteora DBC, NOXA Fun, Bankr, LetsCash, dontblink and Raydium Launchlab are not covered by this source. A pad that cannot be measured is removed rather than shown as zero, because a zero would rank it last on a figure nobody took.

Is launchpad volume the same as launchpad revenue?

No. This is the volume traded on its tokens, not what the pad collected in fees. Fee revenue is published by this source for pump.fun only, and almost its whole history is seeded from a third-party dataset, so it is not read here.

Source code github.com/ChainBench/OpenChainBench/tree/dev/harnesses/terminal-activity