Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesArbitrum
Trails1041.67 min
- p99
- 1769.00 s
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 31
Berachain
Leads7.50 s
- p99
- 9.95 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 1
Arbitrum vs Berachain
Arbitrum leads on 0 of 1 shared benchmarks, Berachain on 1. Berachain wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (7.50 s vs 1041.67 s).
Arbitrum
Optimistic rollup built on Nitro stack with a fast-finality sequencer. Sub-second block times (~250 ms) via a 250 ms default block interval, far below the 2 s OP Stack convention. 7-day fraud-proof window for L1 finality.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesArbitrum
Trails1050.00 min
- p99
- 1197.00 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 4
Berachain
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesArbitrum
Trails27.93 s
- p99
- 1724.80 s
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 752
Berachain
No data in window
Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesArbitrum
Trails12.65 s
- p99
- 55.48 s
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 211
Berachain
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
Arbitrum vs Berachain: which one is better?
Arbitrum and Berachain are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Berachain leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Arbitrum or Berachain?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Berachain leads at 7.50 s versus Arbitrum at 1041.67 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Arbitrum vs Berachain comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.