Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesArbitrum
Trails16.8 min
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 23provisional
Berachain
No data in window
Arbitrum vs Berachain
Arbitrum vs Berachain on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks, awaiting live measurements.
Arbitrum
Optimistic rollup built on Nitro stack with a fast-finality sequencer. Sub-second block times (~250 ms) via a 250 ms default block interval, far below the 2 s OP Stack convention. 7-day fraud-proof window for L1 finality.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesArbitrum
Trails17.9 min
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 26provisional
Berachain
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesArbitrum
Trails25.52 s
- p99
- 27.7 min
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 1,248
Berachain
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
Arbitrum vs Berachain: which one is better?
Arbitrum and Berachain are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.
How is the Arbitrum vs Berachain comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.