Arbitrum vs Flashbots Protect

Arbitrum leads on both live benchmarks. Arbitrum wins on Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains (278 ms vs 708 ms), Most reliable free public RPC, correctness incidents across 7 EVM chains (2 vs 84).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Arbitrum logo
Arbitrum

Optimistic rollup built on Nitro stack with a fast-finality sequencer. Sub-second block times (~250 ms) via a 250 ms default block interval, far below the 2 s OP Stack convention. 7-day fraud-proof window for L1 finality.

Flashbots Protect logo
Flashbots Protect

Flashbots Protect RPC sends transactions through a private mempool, shielding them from sandwich attacks. Read calls go to a standard Ethereum node behind the proxy.

Side by side measurements

Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains (plus Solana and Polkadot)

RPCs

Arbitrum

Leads

278 ms

p99
2.37 s
rank
#7
samples
4,319

Flashbots Protect

Trails

708 ms

p99
1.02 s
rank
#12
samples
4,318

Latency is conditional on success: the harness times only calls returning a valid fresh block, so a mostly-failing endpoint can post a fast p50. Rows below 50 percent success are degraded; unresponsive probes pin below the table. The All chains aggregate favours single-chain foundation endpoints (Base, Binance, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche officials) since they rank on one chain only; use a chain tab for honest comparison. Dead endpoints (cloudflare-eth POST returns -32603) are excluded.

Most reliable free public RPC, correctness incidents across 7 EVM chains

RPCs

Arbitrum

Leads

2

rank
#2
samples
84provisional

Flashbots Protect

Trails

84

rank
samples
84provisional

A zero row means no incident was caught in the window, not a proof of correctness. Most providers post zero most days; this bench exists for the days they do not, and for the errors: a blocked eth_getLogs or a balance read gated behind a paid key at 40 blocks of depth counts as an incident because it is one from the caller's seat.

Rolling 24h · Reliability incidentsRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Arbitrum vs Flashbots Protect: which one is better?

Arbitrum and Flashbots Protect are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Arbitrum leads on Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Arbitrum or Flashbots Protect?

On the Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains benchmark, Arbitrum leads at 278 ms versus Flashbots Protect at 708 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Arbitrum vs Flashbots Protect comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.