Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesArbitrum
Leads12.58 s
- p99
- 56.48 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 141
Sonic
Trails24.03 s
- p99
- 29.88 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 37
Arbitrum vs Sonic
Arbitrum leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Sonic on 0. Arbitrum wins on Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery (12.58 s vs 24.03 s).
Arbitrum
Optimistic rollup built on Nitro stack with a fast-finality sequencer. Sub-second block times (~250 ms) via a 250 ms default block interval, far below the 2 s OP Stack convention. 7-day fraud-proof window for L1 finality.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Arbitrum vs Sonic: which one is better?
Arbitrum and Sonic are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Arbitrum leads on Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery, Arbitrum or Sonic?
On the Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Arbitrum leads at 12.58 s versus Sonic at 24.03 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Arbitrum vs Sonic comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.