Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesArbitrum
Trails3.50 s
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 3provisional
Unichain
No data in window
Arbitrum vs Unichain
Arbitrum leads on the only live benchmark. Arbitrum wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (24.98 s vs 50.42 s).
Arbitrum
Optimistic rollup built on Nitro stack with a fast-finality sequencer. Sub-second block times (~250 ms) via a 250 ms default block interval, far below the 2 s OP Stack convention. 7-day fraud-proof window for L1 finality.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesArbitrum
No data in window
Unichain
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesArbitrum
Leads24.98 s
- p99
- 27.4 min
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 1,854
Unichain
Trails50.42 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 59provisional
Frequently asked questions
Arbitrum vs Unichain: which one is better?
Arbitrum and Unichain are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Arbitrum leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Arbitrum or Unichain?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Arbitrum leads at 24.98 s versus Unichain at 50.42 s (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Arbitrum vs Unichain comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.