Fastest free Archway RPC, live no-key endpoint latency
RPCsArchway Foundation
No data in window
Polkachu
No data in window
Per region
| Region | Archway Foundation | Polkachu |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 159 ms | 201 ms |
| EU-West | 167 ms | 196 ms |
| Singapore | 168 ms | 192 ms |
Archway Foundation vs Polkachu
Archway Foundation vs Polkachu on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.
Polkachu
Community-run Cosmos validator and public RPC network. Operates no-key Tendermint RPC endpoints across 40+ Cosmos SDK chains (osmosis-rpc.polkachu.com, cosmos-rpc.polkachu.com, etc.) with archive support on a paid tier.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Archway Foundation vs Polkachu: which one is better?
Archway Foundation and Polkachu are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.
How is the Archway Foundation vs Polkachu comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.