Arena vs Markets Mobile

Name: Arena vs Markets Mobile OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Markets Mobile leads on the only live benchmark. Markets Mobile wins on Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard ($7,298.92 vs $589.25).

Read methodology Last measured Sat, 22 Aug 2026 03:16:05 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Arena

The Arena is an Avalanche based SocialFi app whose Arena perps feature routes orders to Hyperliquid and exposes copy trading of those positions, using a registered builder code.

Markets Mobile

Markets by Kinetiq is a mobile-first Hyperliquid frontend focused on clean UX for perp trading on iOS and Android. Routes flow through its builder code and appears on the Hyperliquid frontends leaderboard.

Side by side measurements

Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard

Trading

Provider	Builder fees collected	Volume routed	Users 24h	Effective fee bps	Time since last fill
Arena	$589.25	$708.4K	16	0.083%	4.6 min
Markets Mobile	$7,298.92	$16.52M	135	0.044%	6.1 s

Ranking is by raw builder fee revenue in USD, not by value for users. Bigger number means more fees collected via the on-chain builder code field. For the trader cost perspective, switch to the Effective fee bps companion tab. Native Hyperliquid UI orders carry no builder code and are excluded. Data from a local hl node tailing every fill on mainnet.

Frequently asked questions

Arena vs Markets Mobile: which one is better?

Arena and Markets Mobile are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Markets Mobile leads on Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Arena or Markets Mobile?

On the Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard benchmark, Markets Mobile leads at $7,298.92 versus Arena at $589.25. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Arena vs Markets Mobile comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.