Aster vs Bitget

Aster vs Bitget on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
Aster logo
Aster

Aster is a decentralized perps exchange (ex-ApolloX, backed by YZi Labs) on BNB Chain and other EVM networks, with a Binance-compatible API and 8 hour funding periods.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked

Trading

Aster

No data in window

Bitget

Trails

0.0025 %

p99
0%
rank
#2
samples
2,879

Stability is not directionality. A venue with persistently positive but tight-banded funding ranks better here than one that flips between positive and negative every settlement, even if the second venue offers better average carry. Read alongside perp-funding for direction and average level.

Rolling 24h · 24h ETH funding stddevRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Aster vs Bitget: which one is better?

Aster and Bitget are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.

How is the Aster vs Bitget comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.