Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized
TradingAster
Trails0.97 bps
- p99
- 1.40 bps
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 2,880
Bybit
No data in window
Aster vs Bybit
Aster leads on 1 of 2 shared benchmarks, Bybit on 1. Aster wins on Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.0053% vs 0.0071%). Bybit wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (0.39 bps vs 0.97 bps).
Aster
Aster is a decentralized perps exchange (ex-ApolloX, backed by YZi Labs) on BNB Chain and other EVM networks, with a Binance-compatible API and 8 hour funding periods.
Bybit
Bybit is one of the largest centralized derivatives exchanges, with USDT-margined linear perpetuals on hundreds of pairs and funding settled on 8 hour (some pairs 4 hour) periods.
Side by side measurements
Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked
TradingAster
Leads0.0053 %
- p99
- 0.017%
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 2,880
Bybit
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
Aster vs Bybit: which one is better?
Aster and Bybit are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aster leads on Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked. Bybit leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on perp dex funding stability, 24h stddev of eth funding ranked, Aster or Bybit?
On the Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked benchmark, Aster leads at 0.0053% versus Bybit at 0.0071%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster on cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized, Aster or Bybit?
On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Bybit leads at 0.39 bps versus Aster at 0.97 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Aster vs Bybit comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.