Solana transaction landing services market share
TradingAstralane
Trails23.6K
- p99
- 23.6K
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 23,592
Nozomi
Leads58.8K
- p99
- 58.8K
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 58,833
Astralane vs Nozomi
Astralane leads on 0 of 1 shared benchmarks, Nozomi on 1. Nozomi wins on Solana transaction landing services market share (58.8K vs 23.6K).
Astralane
Solana transaction landing service. Iris sender uses validator co-location and leader-schedule-aware routing for p90 sub-slot latency on high-frequency workloads.
Nozomi
Solana transaction landing service by Temporal Labs. Direct-to-leader submission from 9 colocated regions, tip paid only on successful landing.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Solana RPC for tx landing, live slot delta benchmark
TradingAstralane
No data in window
Nozomi
No data in window
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.