Avalanche vs Binance

Binance leads on the only live benchmark. Binance wins on Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains (73 ms vs 178 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
Avalanche logo
Avalanche

Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.

Binance logo
Binance

Official BNB Chain RPC endpoints operated by Binance. Multiple dataseed hosts (`bsc-dataseed1.binance.org` etc.) round-robin for load distribution.

Side by side measurements

Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains (plus Solana and Polkadot)

RPCs

Avalanche

Trails

178 ms

p99
638 ms
rank
#2
samples
4,318

Binance

Leads

73 ms

p99
389 ms
rank
#1
samples
4,317

Latency is conditional on success: the harness times only calls returning a valid fresh block, so a mostly-failing endpoint can post a fast p50. Rows below 50 percent success are degraded; unresponsive probes pin below the table. The All chains aggregate favours single-chain foundation endpoints (Base, Binance, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche officials) since they rank on one chain only; use a chain tab for honest comparison. Dead endpoints (cloudflare-eth POST returns -32603) are excluded.

Frequently asked questions

Avalanche vs Binance: which one is better?

Avalanche and Binance are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Binance leads on Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Avalanche or Binance?

On the Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains benchmark, Binance leads at 73 ms versus Avalanche at 178 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Avalanche vs Binance comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.