Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesAvalanche
Trails4.23 s
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 58provisional
Berachain
No data in window
Avalanche vs Berachain
Avalanche leads on the only live benchmark. Avalanche wins on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (51.43 s vs 2.3 min).
Avalanche
Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesAvalanche
Leads51.43 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 22provisional
Berachain
Trails2.3 min
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 3provisional
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesAvalanche
Trails32.05 s
- p99
- 3.0 min
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 108
Berachain
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
Avalanche vs Berachain: which one is better?
Avalanche and Berachain are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Avalanche leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Avalanche or Berachain?
On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Avalanche leads at 51.43 s (provisional) versus Berachain at 2.3 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Avalanche vs Berachain comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.