Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesAvalanche
Trails6.21 s
- p99
- 14.74 s
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 137
Injective
No data in window
Avalanche vs Injective
Avalanche vs Injective on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks, awaiting live measurements.
Avalanche
Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.
Injective
Cosmos SDK L1 with a native onchain orderbook and EVM compatibility layer. CometBFT consensus, sub-second block time, deterministic finality per block. TokenFactory MsgCreateDenom carries a flat 0.1 INJ governance fee on top of gas.
Side by side measurements
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesAvalanche
Trails34.38 s
- p99
- 2.9 min
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 246
Injective
No data in window
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesAvalanche
Trails46.75 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 73provisional
Injective
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
Avalanche vs Injective: which one is better?
Avalanche and Injective are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.
How is the Avalanche vs Injective comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.