Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesAvalanche
Trails7.31 s
- p99
- 14.43 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 34
Injective
No data in window
Avalanche vs Injective
Avalanche vs Injective on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks, awaiting live measurements.
Avalanche
Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.
Injective
Cosmos SDK L1 with a native onchain orderbook and EVM compatibility layer. CometBFT consensus, sub-second block time, deterministic finality per block. TokenFactory MsgCreateDenom carries a flat 0.1 INJ governance fee on top of gas.
Side by side measurements
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesAvalanche
Trails49.58 s
- p99
- 211.19 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 74
Injective
No data in window
Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesAvalanche
No data in window
Injective
No data in window
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesAvalanche
Trails26.67 s
- p99
- 118.80 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 4
Injective
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
Avalanche vs Injective: which one is better?
Avalanche and Injective are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.
How is the Avalanche vs Injective comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.