Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesAvalanche
Trails3.74 s
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 51provisional
Mantle
No data in window
Avalanche vs Mantle
Avalanche leads on all 3 live benchmarks. Avalanche wins on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (1.1 min vs 25.0 min), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (43.59 s vs 1.0 min), Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery (36.43 s vs 45.0 min).
Avalanche
Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.
Mantle
Modular OP Stack fork using EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum calldata, cutting L1 anchoring cost. 2-second sequencer block time, MNT token for gas (ETH-pegged).
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesAvalanche
Leads1.1 min
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 43provisional
Mantle
Trails25.0 min
- rank
- #12
- samples
- 1provisional
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesAvalanche
Leads43.59 s
- p99
- 4.5 min
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 544
Mantle
Trails1.0 min
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 44provisional
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesAvalanche
Leads36.43 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 15provisional
Mantle
Trails45.0 min
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 1provisional
Frequently asked questions
Avalanche vs Mantle: which one is better?
Avalanche and Mantle are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Avalanche leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Avalanche or Mantle?
On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Avalanche leads at 1.1 min (provisional) versus Mantle at 25.0 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Avalanche vs Mantle comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.