Avalanche vs Nodies

Avalanche leads on the only live benchmark. Avalanche wins on Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains (179 ms vs 301 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
Avalanche logo
Avalanche

Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.

Nodies logo
Nodies

Nodies is the surviving public-RPC frontend for POKT Network's decentralized infrastructure. Per-chain subdomains like `eth-pokt.nodies.app`, `polygon-pokt.nodies.app`, `arb-pokt.nodies.app`. Covers most major EVM chains no-key.

Side by side measurements

Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains (plus Solana and Polkadot)

RPCs

Avalanche

Leads

179 ms

p99
638 ms
rank
#2
samples
4,318

Nodies

Trails

301 ms

p99
2.01 s
rank
#8
samples
25,876

Latency is conditional on success: the harness times only calls returning a valid fresh block, so a mostly-failing endpoint can post a fast p50. Rows below 50 percent success are degraded; unresponsive probes pin below the table. The All chains aggregate favours single-chain foundation endpoints (Base, Binance, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche officials) since they rank on one chain only; use a chain tab for honest comparison. Dead endpoints (cloudflare-eth POST returns -32603) are excluded.

Frequently asked questions

Avalanche vs Nodies: which one is better?

Avalanche and Nodies are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Avalanche leads on Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Avalanche or Nodies?

On the Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains benchmark, Avalanche leads at 179 ms versus Nodies at 301 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Avalanche vs Nodies comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.