Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesAvalanche
Trails4.19 s
- p99
- 14.36 s
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 89
Scroll
No data in window
Avalanche vs Scroll
Avalanche leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Scroll on 0. Avalanche wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (55.71 s vs 5.2 min).
Avalanche
Primary Network runs the Snowman BFT consensus derived from Snow protocols. Sub-second deterministic finality with no chain reorganizations.
Scroll
Native bytecode-equivalent zkEVM rollup. Sequencer cadence is prover-bound: empty periods see longer gaps between blocks while busy minutes produce blocks at a sub-3-second rate.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesAvalanche
Trails2.0 min
- p99
- 14.2 min
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 16
Scroll
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesAvalanche
Leads55.71 s
- p99
- 13.2 min
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 146
Scroll
Trails5.2 min
- p99
- 9.9 min
- rank
- #17
- samples
- 29
Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesAvalanche
Trails20.00 s
- p99
- 29.80 s
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 4
Scroll
No data in window
Fastest Axelar GMP source chain by end-to-end delivery
BridgesAvalanche
Trails46.67 s
- p99
- 2.0 min
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 26
Scroll
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
Avalanche vs Scroll: which one is better?
Avalanche and Scroll are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Avalanche leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest layerzero source chain by end-to-end message delivery, Avalanche or Scroll?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Avalanche leads at 55.71 s versus Scroll at 5.2 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Avalanche vs Scroll comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.