B-Harvest vs Hyperdash

Name: B-Harvest vs Hyperdash OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Hyperdash leads on the only live benchmark. Hyperdash wins on Hyperliquid validator leaderboard (2.18% vs 2.13%).

Read methodology Last measured Sat, 22 Aug 2026 03:14:22 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

B-Harvest

Hyperdash

Advanced trading terminal for Hyperliquid offering real time analytics, portfolio tracking, and copytrading vaults.

Side by side measurements

Hyperliquid validator leaderboard: live net APR, uptime, commission

Blockchains

B-Harvest

Trails

2.13 %

p99: 2.13%
rank: #25
samples: 417,974,000

Hyperdash

Leads

2.18 %

p99: 2.18%
rank: #16
samples: 783,210,000

net_yield = predictedApr.day x uptimeFraction from /info validatorSummaries. No MEV layer at the validator level on Hyperliquid; the centralised sequencer captures order-flow value upstream. Jailed validators land at 0 bps regardless of published APR. APRs cluster at 200 to 225 bps across the active set; commission rate is the primary differentiator for delegators.

Frequently asked questions

B-Harvest vs Hyperdash: which one is better?

B-Harvest and Hyperdash are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Hyperdash leads on Hyperliquid validator leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, B-Harvest or Hyperdash?

On the Hyperliquid validator leaderboard benchmark, Hyperdash leads at 2.18% versus B-Harvest at 2.13%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the B-Harvest vs Hyperdash comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.