Band Protocol vs Stakewolle

Name: Band Protocol vs Stakewolle OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Band Protocol vs Stakewolle on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.

Read methodology Last measured Tue, 01 Sep 2026 20:53:03 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Band Protocol

Band Protocol official public Tendermint RPC node for the laozi-mainnet. Keyless endpoint maintained by the Band Protocol team.

Stakewolle

Stakewolle community validator and public RPC provider. Runs keyless Tendermint RPC endpoints for multiple Cosmos SDK chains.

Side by side measurements

Fastest free Band Protocol RPC, live no-key endpoint latency

RPCs

Band Protocol

Trails

188 ms

p99: 381 ms
rank: #1
samples: 4,321

Stakewolle

No data in window

Frequently asked questions

Band Protocol vs Stakewolle: which one is better?

Band Protocol and Stakewolle are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.

How is the Band Protocol vs Stakewolle comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.