BasedBot vs Maestro

BasedBot leads on all 3 live benchmarks. BasedBot wins on Memecoin trading fees (0.57% vs 1.89%), Average swap size on Solana ($148.91 vs $113.29), Unique daily swap transactions on Solana (95.8K vs 10.2K).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
Maestro logo
Maestro

Maestro is a suite of Telegram trading bots for DeFi — Sniper, Wallet, Whale and Buy — trusted by traders on Solana, Ethereum, BNB Chain and Base. It charges a 1% fee on each sniped buy.

Side by side measurements

Solana memecoin platform fee rates: Axiom vs Fomo vs pump.fun vs GMGN vs Trojan, live 24h

Trading

BasedBot

Leads

0.57 %

p99
0.57%
rank
#1
samples
80,877

Maestro

Trails

1.89 %

p99
1.89%
rank
#8
samples
10,410

Take rate = fees / volume * 100. Fees are on-chain inflows to known fee wallets (Dune query 8316589, refreshed every 6h). Fomo fees come from DeFiLlama (on-chain USDC + off-chain relay). Volume is total Mobula-attributed volume; the take rate is a lower bound since platforms with variable or waivable fees will show lower observed rates.

Average swap size on Solana: pump.fun vs GMGN vs Fomo vs Axiom, live

Trading

BasedBot

Leads

$148.91

p99
$148.91
rank
#1
samples
95,788

Maestro

Trails

$113.29

p99
$113.29
rank
#3
samples
11,245

Average swap size is computed as 24h attributed volume divided by 24h attributed trade count from Mobula lighthouse. Both numerator and denominator include bot and MEV activity; the metric reflects all on-chain swaps attributed to each platform, not human-only trades. pump.fun volume comes from the byLaunchpad bucket (bonding-curve swaps via pump.fun's own frontend); all other platforms come from byPlatform. Attribution is mutually exclusive per Mobula's referral-tag methodology.

Unique daily swap transactions on Solana: pump.fun vs GMGN vs Fomo vs Axiom vs Trojan, live

Trading

BasedBot

Leads

95.8K

p99
95.8K
rank
#6
samples
95,788

Maestro

Trails

10.2K

p99
10.2K
rank
#9
samples
10,223

Counts unique tx_ids per platform, not unique wallets. Actual unique-wallet count is 3-10x lower since active traders execute multiple transactions per day. Includes bots, MEV searchers, and multi-wallet traders. Terminals (GMGN, Axiom, Fomo, Trojan, Photon, Maestro) use fee wallet inflow detection; pump.fun uses Dune Spellbook (dex_solana.trades, project IN pumpdotfun/pumpswap) to avoid noise from fee-wallet micro-inflows at 0% fee.

Rolling 24h · Unique swap tx 24hRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

BasedBot vs Maestro: which one is better?

BasedBot and Maestro are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. BasedBot leads on Memecoin trading fees. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, BasedBot or Maestro?

On the Solana memecoin platform fee rates benchmark, BasedBot leads at 0.57% versus Maestro at 1.89%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the BasedBot vs Maestro comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.