Bebop vs Enso on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.
Gasless RFQ DEX aggregating onchain and offchain liquidity. Bebop Router and the JAM just-in-time auction model combine market-maker quotes with onchain pools across multiple EVM chains.
DeFi shared engine that maps onchain interactions into composable actions. The Route API computes optimal multi-step paths across protocols and chains, abstracting approvals, swaps, vault entries, and bridges into a single call.
Bebop
No data in window
Enso
No data in window
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | US East | EU West | Singapore | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethereum | Bebop | 755 ms | 747 ms | 728 ms | 743 ms |
| Enso | 1.52 s | 1.48 s | 1.47 s | 1.49 s | |
| Base | Bebop | 778 ms | 773 ms | 785 ms | 778 ms |
| Enso | 1.21 s | 969 ms | 904 ms | 1.03 s | |
| Arbitrum | Bebop | 428 ms | 423 ms | 427 ms | 426 ms |
| Enso | 1.50 s | 1.41 s | 1.40 s | 1.44 s | |
| BSC | Bebop | 961 ms | 962 ms | 934 ms | 952 ms |
| Enso | 1.55 s | 1.52 s | 1.48 s | 1.52 s |
Bebop and Enso are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.