Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesBerachain
Leads7.50 s
- p99
- 9.95 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 1
Ethereum
Trails926.61 min
- p99
- 1194.53 s
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 1,130
Berachain vs Ethereum
Berachain leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Ethereum on 0. Berachain wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (7.50 s vs 926.61 s).
Ethereum
PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesBerachain
No data in window
Ethereum
Trails1033.07 min
- p99
- 1705.20 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 79
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesBerachain
No data in window
Ethereum
Trails250.23 min
- p99
- 1179.41 s
- rank
- #16
- samples
- 608
Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesBerachain
No data in window
Ethereum
Trails239.76 min
- p99
- 298.80 s
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 253
Frequently asked questions
Berachain vs Ethereum: which one is better?
Berachain and Ethereum are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Berachain leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Berachain or Ethereum?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Berachain leads at 7.50 s versus Ethereum at 926.61 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Berachain vs Ethereum comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.