Berachain vs Ink

Berachain leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Ink on 0. Berachain wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (7.50 s vs 10.00 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Berachain vs Ink: which one is better?

Berachain and Ink are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Berachain leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Berachain or Ink?

On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Berachain leads at 7.50 s versus Ink at 10.00 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Berachain vs Ink comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.