Berachain vs Mantle

Berachain leads on the only live benchmark. Berachain wins on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (2.3 min vs 25.0 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
Mantle logo
Mantle

Modular OP Stack fork using EigenDA for data availability rather than Ethereum calldata, cutting L1 anchoring cost. 2-second sequencer block time, MNT token for gas (ETH-pegged).

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Berachain vs Mantle: which one is better?

Berachain and Mantle are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Berachain leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Berachain or Mantle?

On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Berachain leads at 2.3 min (provisional) versus Mantle at 25.0 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Berachain vs Mantle comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.