Binance.US vs Bybit

Name: Binance.US vs Bybit OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Bybit leads on the only live benchmark. Bybit wins on iOS App Store rating (4.69x vs 4.21x).

Read methodology Last measured Thu, 13 Aug 2026 21:17:37 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Binance.US

Binance.US is the US-regulated affiliate of Binance, operating under FinCEN MSB registration. It offers spot trading for US customers on a subset of the global Binance order book.

Bybit

Bybit is one of the largest centralized derivatives exchanges, with USDT-margined linear perpetuals on hundreds of pairs and funding settled on 8 hour (some pairs 4 hour) periods.

Side by side measurements

Crypto trading app iOS ratings: Coinbase vs Robinhood vs Crypto.com vs Bybit, live

Trading

Provider	App Store rating	Review count
Binance.US	4.21x	111.0K
Bybit	4.69x	46.9K

Ratings reflect the current all-time average user rating from the Apple App Store as returned by the iTunes lookup API. Apple does not expose star-distribution breakdowns or time-windowed averages via the public API. A high rating with few reviews carries more statistical uncertainty than the same rating with tens of thousands of reviews. The review count column shows how many users contributed to each rating.

Frequently asked questions

Binance.US vs Bybit: which one is better?

Binance.US and Bybit are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Bybit leads on iOS App Store rating. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is higher-rated, Binance.US or Bybit?

On the Crypto trading app iOS ratings benchmark, Bybit leads at 4.69x versus Binance.US at 4.21x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Binance.US vs Bybit comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.