OpenChainBench

Binance vs Lava Network

Split decision: Binance leads on Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains (73 ms vs 275 ms); Lava Network leads on Most reliable free public RPC, correctness incidents across 7 EVM chains (1 vs 49).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Binance logo
Binance

Official BNB Chain RPC endpoints operated by Binance. Multiple dataseed hosts (`bsc-dataseed1.binance.org` etc.) round-robin for load distribution.

Lava Network logo
Lava Network

Lava Network is a decentralized RPC mesh with permissionless validators. Public no-key endpoints work for Ethereum (`eth1.lava.build`) and Arbitrum (`arb1.lava.build`); other chains require an account-issued key.

Side by side measurements

Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains (plus Solana and Polkadot)

RPCs

Binance

Leads

73 ms

p99
391 ms
rank
#1
samples
4,317

Lava Network

Trails

275 ms

p99
2.28 s
rank
#6
samples
30,194

Latency is conditional on success: the harness times only calls returning a valid fresh block, so a mostly-failing endpoint can post a fast p50. Rows below 50 percent success are degraded; unresponsive probes pin below the table. The All chains aggregate favours single-chain foundation endpoints (Base, Binance, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche officials) since they rank on one chain only; use a chain tab for honest comparison. Dead endpoints (cloudflare-eth POST returns -32603) are excluded.

Most reliable free public RPC, correctness incidents across 7 EVM chains

RPCs

Binance

Trails

49

rank
—
samples
82provisional

Lava Network

Leads

1

p99
122
rank
#1
samples
166

A zero row means no incident was caught in the window, not a proof of correctness. Most providers post zero most days; this bench exists for the days they do not, and for the errors: a blocked eth_getLogs or a balance read gated behind a paid key at 40 blocks of depth counts as an incident because it is one from the caller's seat.

Rolling 24h · Reliability incidentsRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Binance vs Lava Network: which one is better?

Binance and Lava Network are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Binance leads on Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains. Lava Network leads on Most reliable free public RPC, correctness incidents across 7 EVM chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Binance or Lava Network?

On the Fastest free public RPC for Ethereum, BNB, Polygon and 23 more chains benchmark, Binance leads at 73 ms versus Lava Network at 275 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster, Binance or Lava Network?

On the Most reliable free public RPC, correctness incidents across 7 EVM chains benchmark, Lava Network leads at 1 versus Binance at 49 (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Binance vs Lava Network comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.