Bitget Wallet vs Tread.fi

Name: Bitget Wallet vs Tread.fi OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Bitget Wallet vs Tread.fi on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.

Read methodology Last measured Sun, 23 Aug 2026 04:08:35 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Bitget Wallet

Bitget Wallet is the self-custodial wallet by Bitget; its Hyperliquid perps integration launched Dec 2025 and routes orders through a registered builder code (HL referral code BITGETWALLET, 3.6k+ referrals).

Tread.fi

Institutional grade algorithmic trading terminal and OEMS for retail and pro traders, integrated with Hyperliquid and major CEXs.

Side by side measurements

Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard

Trading

Provider	Volume routed	Users 24h	Effective fee bps	Time since last fill
Bitget Wallet	$14.87M	337	0.045%	2.0 s
Tread.fi	$7.00M	85	0.017%	4.2 s

Ranking is by raw builder fee revenue in USD, not by value for users. Bigger number means more fees collected via the on-chain builder code field. For the trader cost perspective, switch to the Effective fee bps companion tab. Native Hyperliquid UI orders carry no builder code and are excluded. Data from a local hl node tailing every fill on mainnet.

Frequently asked questions

Bitget Wallet vs Tread.fi: which one is better?

Bitget Wallet and Tread.fi are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.

How is the Bitget Wallet vs Tread.fi comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.