OpenChainBench

Bitwise Onchain Solutions x FalconX vs Hypurrscanning

Hypurrscanning leads on the only live benchmark. Hypurrscanning wins on Hyperliquid validator leaderboard (2.21% vs 2.18%).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
BO
Bitwise Onchain Solutions x FalconX
HY
Hypurrscanning

Side by side measurements

Hyperliquid validator leaderboard: live net APR, uptime, commission

Blockchains

Bitwise Onchain Solutions x FalconX

Trails

2.18 %

p99
2.18%
rank
#11
samples
319,033,000

Hypurrscanning

Leads

2.21 %

p99
2.21%
rank
#5
samples
1,982,200,000

net_yield = predictedApr.day x uptimeFraction from /info validatorSummaries. No MEV layer at the validator level on Hyperliquid; the centralised sequencer captures order-flow value upstream. Jailed validators land at 0 bps regardless of published APR. APRs cluster at 200 to 225 bps across the active set; commission rate is the primary differentiator for delegators.

Frequently asked questions

Bitwise Onchain Solutions x FalconX vs Hypurrscanning: which one is better?

Bitwise Onchain Solutions x FalconX and Hypurrscanning are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Hypurrscanning leads on Hyperliquid validator leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Bitwise Onchain Solutions x FalconX or Hypurrscanning?

On the Hyperliquid validator leaderboard benchmark, Hypurrscanning leads at 2.21% versus Bitwise Onchain Solutions x FalconX at 2.18%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Bitwise Onchain Solutions x FalconX vs Hypurrscanning comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.