Fastest free Blast RPC, live no-key endpoint latency
RPCsBlast
Leads2 ms
- p99
- 13 ms
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 4,313
dRPC
Trails200 ms
- p99
- 451 ms
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 4,314
Per region
| Region | Blast | dRPC |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 2 ms | 199 ms |
| EU-West | 2 ms | 199 ms |
| Singapore | 2 ms | 203 ms |
Blast vs dRPC
Blast leads on the only live benchmark. Blast wins on Fastest free Blast RPC, live no-key endpoint latency (2 ms vs 200 ms).
dRPC
Decentralized RPC mesh routing requests across third-party node providers with consensus checks. Free public tier plus higher-tier authenticated access.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Blast vs dRPC: which one is better?
Blast and dRPC are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Blast leads on Fastest free Blast RPC, live no-key endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Blast or dRPC?
On the Fastest free Blast RPC, live no-key endpoint latency benchmark, Blast leads at 2 ms versus dRPC at 200 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Blast vs dRPC comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.