Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage
RPCs| Provider | Wallet call latency | Chains covered | Method coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blink | 102 ms | 3 | 7 |
| Flashbots Protect | 100 ms | 1 | 5 |
Blink vs Flashbots Protect
Flashbots Protect leads on the only live benchmark. Flashbots Protect wins on Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage (100 ms vs 102 ms).
Flashbots Protect
Flashbots Protect RPC sends transactions through a private mempool, shielding them from sandwich attacks. Read calls go to a standard Ethereum node behind the proxy.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Blink vs Flashbots Protect: which one is better?
Blink and Flashbots Protect are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Flashbots Protect leads on Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Blink or Flashbots Protect?
On the Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage benchmark, Flashbots Protect leads at 100 ms versus Blink at 102 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Blink vs Flashbots Protect comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.