Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage
RPCs| Provider | Wallet call latency | Chains covered | Method coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlockSec Anti-MEV | 117 ms | 2 | 7 |
| bloXroute | 8 ms | 2 | 7 |
BlockSec Anti-MEV vs bloXroute
bloXroute leads on the only live benchmark. bloXroute wins on Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage (8 ms vs 117 ms).
BlockSec Anti-MEV
BlockSec is a blockchain security company behind the Phalcon toolchain, audits and attack monitoring. Its Anti-MEV RPC applies private transaction routing to shield Ethereum and BSC users from sandwich attacks.
bloXroute
bloXroute Labs runs a low-latency blockchain distribution network for traders and validators. Its free Protect RPC routes Ethereum and BSC transactions away from the public mempool, and its Solana relay competes on transaction landing.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
BlockSec Anti-MEV vs bloXroute: which one is better?
BlockSec Anti-MEV and bloXroute are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. bloXroute leads on Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, BlockSec Anti-MEV or bloXroute?
On the Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage benchmark, bloXroute leads at 8 ms versus BlockSec Anti-MEV at 117 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the BlockSec Anti-MEV vs bloXroute comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.