Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage
RPCs| Provider | Wallet call latency | Chains covered | Method coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlockSec Anti-MEV | 117 ms | 2 | 7 |
| Flashbots Protect | 101 ms | 1 | 5 |
BlockSec Anti-MEV vs Flashbots Protect
Flashbots Protect leads on the only live benchmark. Flashbots Protect wins on Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage (101 ms vs 117 ms).
BlockSec Anti-MEV
BlockSec is a blockchain security company behind the Phalcon toolchain, audits and attack monitoring. Its Anti-MEV RPC applies private transaction routing to shield Ethereum and BSC users from sandwich attacks.
Flashbots Protect
Flashbots Protect RPC sends transactions through a private mempool, shielding them from sandwich attacks. Read calls go to a standard Ethereum node behind the proxy.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
BlockSec Anti-MEV vs Flashbots Protect: which one is better?
BlockSec Anti-MEV and Flashbots Protect are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Flashbots Protect leads on Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, BlockSec Anti-MEV or Flashbots Protect?
On the Fastest MEV protection RPC, live wallet latency and method coverage benchmark, Flashbots Protect leads at 101 ms versus BlockSec Anti-MEV at 117 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the BlockSec Anti-MEV vs Flashbots Protect comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.